Tatum v. Crownover

125 S.W. 1010, 94 Ark. 58, 1910 Ark. LEXIS 368
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided February 21, 1910·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Hart, J.

This was a chancery suit instituted by appellees against appellants. The record shows that the case was heard on oral evidence. A decree was entered in favor of appellee on the 8th day of April, 1909, and the appellants were given 60 days within which to prepare and file a bill of exceptions. The bill of exceptions was signed by the chancellor and filed with the clerk on the 26th day of June, 1909, which was not within the time granted. Therefore, the evidence is not brought in the record, and the presumption is that the decree was correct.

The decree will, therefore, be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tatum v. Crownover, 125 S.W. 1010, 94 Ark. 58, 1910 Ark. LEXIS 368 (Ark. 1910).

125 S.W. 1010 (Tatum v. Crownover) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Person v. Miller Levee District No. 2
237 S.W.2d 38 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1950)
Engles v. Oklahoma Oil & Gas Co.
259 S.W. 749 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1924)
Newald v. Valley Farming Co.
202 S.W. 838 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1918)
Stevens v. Benton County
195 S.W. 353 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1917)