Tatum Land Co. v. Marjohn Realty Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Tatum Land Co. v. Marjohn Realty Co.

109 So. 813, 92 Fla. 534, 1926 Fla. LEXIS 647

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedAugust 5, 1926

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 109 So. 813 (Tatum Land Co. v. Marjohn Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tatum Land Co. v. Marjohn Realty Co., 109 So. 813, 92 Fla. 534, 1926 Fla. LEXIS 647 (Fla. 1926).

Pincite

Opinions

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order overruling demurrer to the Amended Bill of Complaint herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order overruling demurrer to Amended Bill of Complaint; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order overruling demurrer to Amended Bill of Complaint of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

WHITFIELD, P. J., AND TERRELL AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.

*Page 535

RE-HEARING. 1. In this State the authority to an agent to bind the principal to convey real estate is not required to be in writing and therefore, it is held that this case is not controlled by the law, as enunciated in the case of Grafton v. Cummings, 99 U.S. Rep. 100.

Petition for rehearing is denied.

Shutts Bowen and John S. Benz, Attorney for Appellants;

Norris McElya, Attorney for Appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order overruling demurrer to the Amended Bill of Complaint herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order overruling demurrer to Amended Bill of Complaint; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order overruling demurrer to Amended Bill of Complaint of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.