Tatum, Kevin Terrell
This text of Tatum, Kevin Terrell (Tatum, Kevin Terrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS WR-73,771-05
KEVIN TERRELL TATUM, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1042008-A IN THE 179TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and
sentenced to forty-five years’ imprisonment. The First Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction.
Tatum v. State, No. 01-06-01190-CR (Tex. App—Houston [1st Dist.] Aug. 29, 2008)(not designated
for publication).
Applicant filed his initial habeas application with the Harris County District Clerk on
September 10, 2009. On September 5, 2013, before this Court received the application, Applicant 2
filed a “Motion for Leave to Supplement Writ with Annexed Affidavit” with the Harris County
District Clerk. In the supplement, Applicant raised one ground of actual innocence and attached an
affidavit from an eyewitness. Applicant did not file this supplement on the form, which is required
for it to be properly filed and considered. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.1(a); 73.2.
This Court received Applicant’s application on October 27, 2014 and denied relief without
a written order on March 19, 2014. Though the supplemental ground was appropriately filed in the
trial court, it was not presented on the 11.07 form. This rendered the -05 habeas application non-
compliant with the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Therefore, we now withdraw the denial of Applicant’s -05 application, reconsider the case
on our own motion, and dismiss the -05 application as non-compliant. Applicant is free to file
another writ application that is compliant with the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Filed: April 15, 2015 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tatum, Kevin Terrell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tatum-kevin-terrell-texcrimapp-2015.