Tatum, Kevin Terrell

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 15, 2015
DocketWR-73,771-05
StatusPublished

This text of Tatum, Kevin Terrell (Tatum, Kevin Terrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tatum, Kevin Terrell, (Tex. 2015).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS WR-73,771-05

KEVIN TERRELL TATUM, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1042008-A IN THE 179TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and

sentenced to forty-five years’ imprisonment. The First Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction.

Tatum v. State, No. 01-06-01190-CR (Tex. App—Houston [1st Dist.] Aug. 29, 2008)(not designated

for publication).

Applicant filed his initial habeas application with the Harris County District Clerk on

September 10, 2009. On September 5, 2013, before this Court received the application, Applicant 2

filed a “Motion for Leave to Supplement Writ with Annexed Affidavit” with the Harris County

District Clerk. In the supplement, Applicant raised one ground of actual innocence and attached an

affidavit from an eyewitness. Applicant did not file this supplement on the form, which is required

for it to be properly filed and considered. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.1(a); 73.2.

This Court received Applicant’s application on October 27, 2014 and denied relief without

a written order on March 19, 2014. Though the supplemental ground was appropriately filed in the

trial court, it was not presented on the 11.07 form. This rendered the -05 habeas application non-

compliant with the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Therefore, we now withdraw the denial of Applicant’s -05 application, reconsider the case

on our own motion, and dismiss the -05 application as non-compliant. Applicant is free to file

another writ application that is compliant with the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Filed: April 15, 2015 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tatum, Kevin Terrell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tatum-kevin-terrell-texcrimapp-2015.