Tattenham v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Tattenham v. Superior Court

100 P. 248, 155 Cal. 205, 1909 Cal. LEXIS 414

California Supreme Court·Decided February 16, 1909·No. S.F. No. 5195.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

This is a petition for the writ of certiorari. It is alleged that the petitioners have been enjoined in an action to which they were not parties, and therefore not subject to the jurisdiction of the court granting the injunction. If they can appeal it is conceded they have no right to the writ, and there is no doubt that they can appeal by making themselves parties in the manner pointed out in Elliott v. Superior Court, 144 Cal. 509, [103 Am. St. Rep. 102, 77 P. 1109].

Writ denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is a petition for the writ of certiorari. It is alleged that the petitioners have been enjoined in an action to which they were not parties, and therefore not subject to the jurisdiction of the court granting the injunction. If they can appeal it is conceded they have no right to the writ, and there is no doubt that they can appeal by making themselves parties in the manner pointed out in Elliott v. Superior Court, 144 Cal. 509, [103 Am. St. Rep. 102, 77 P. 1109].

Writ denied.

Tattenham v. Superior Court, 100 P. 248, 155 Cal. 205, 1909 Cal. LEXIS 414 (Cal. 1909).

Pincite

100 P. 248 (Tattenham v. Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related