Tatro v. Texas

Fourth Circuit

Tatro v. Texas

741 F.2d 82, 19 Educ. L. Rep. 477

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 23, 1984

DocketNo. 81-1454

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 741 F.2d 82 (Tatro v. Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tatro v. Texas, 741 F.2d 82, 19 Educ. L. Rep. 477 (4th Cir. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before BROWN, GEE and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.

As directed by the mandate of the Supreme Court, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 3371, 82 L.Ed.2d 664, we vacate our judgment insofar only as it affirms the trial court’s award of attorneys’ fees, 703 F.2d 823, and reverse that award. In all other respects, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. It is so

ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before BROWN, GEE and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.

As directed by the mandate of the Supreme Court, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 3371, 82 L.Ed.2d 664, we vacate our judgment insofar only as it affirms the trial court’s award of attorneys’ fees, 703 F.2d 823, and reverse that award. In all other respects, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. It is so

ORDERED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

741 F.2d 82, 19 Educ. L. Rep. 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tatro-v-texas-ca4-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack