Tatro v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tatro v. State

91 So. 3d 261, 2012 WL 2466161, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10554

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 29, 2012

DocketNo. 5D11-1901

StatusPublished

This text of 91 So. 3d 261 (Tatro v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tatro v. State, 91 So. 3d 261, 2012 WL 2466161, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10554 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As conceded by the State, the crimes for which Tatro was charged and convicted under Counts I and II in Case No. 2010-00733-CFAWS were first degree misdemeanors not, as apparently believed by all parties at the sentencing hearing, third degree felonies. On remand, the trial court shall correct the judgment to reflect that the offenses set forth in Counts I and II are first degree misdemeanors and re-sentence Tatro accordingly. Tatro’s convictions and sentences on Counts III and IV in Case No. 2010-00733-CFAWS and his judgment and sentence in Case No. 2010-00529-CFAWS are affirmed.

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; REMANDED.

SAWAYA, EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

As conceded by the State, the crimes for which Tatro was charged and convicted under Counts I and II in Case No. 2010-00733-CFAWS were first degree misdemeanors not, as apparently believed by all parties at the sentencing hearing, third degree felonies. On remand, the trial court shall correct the judgment to reflect that the offenses set forth in Counts I and II are first degree misdemeanors and re-sentence Tatro accordingly. Tatro’s convictions and sentences on Counts III and IV in Case No. 2010-00733-CFAWS and his judgment and sentence in Case No. 2010-00529-CFAWS are affirmed.

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; REMANDED.

SAWAYA, EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 So. 3d 261, 2012 WL 2466161, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tatro-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.