Tatiana Telegina v. Valadimir Nechayuk
This text of Tatiana Telegina v. Valadimir Nechayuk (Tatiana Telegina v. Valadimir Nechayuk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-22-00383-CV __________________
TATIANA TELEGINA, Appellant
V.
VALADIMIR NECHAYUK, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 17-11-14052-CV __________________________________________________________________
SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OPINION
On December 12, 2024, we issued our original opinion in this case,
conditionally affirming the trial court’s judgment and suggesting a remittitur, which
when combined totals $145,000. See Tex. R. App. P. 46.3. We further provided that
should the appellee, Valadimir Nechayuk, file a remittitur within fifteen days from
the date of our opinion and agree to accept the proposed remittitur, we would reform
the trial court’s judgment, reducing the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees to the
amounts the evidence supported and then affirm the judgment as reformed. On
1 December 17, 2024, Nechayuk filed a notice of acceptance of remittitur with the
Clerk of the Court, in which he stated he would accept the remittitur, as suggested
by the Court. He asked the Court to affirm the judgment in all other respects.
Because Nechayuk agreed to the proposed remittitur, we issue this
supplemental opinion. In accordance with our original opinion and Nechayuk’s
timely-filed remittitur, the trial court’s judgment is reformed as follows. The trial
court’s award of appellate attorney’s fees are reduced by $145,000, which represents
a reduction to $155,000 of the amount awarded in the original judgment as appellate
attorney’s fees. Consequently, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that
Valadimir Nechayuk recover the following from Tatiana Telegina:
1. EIGHT HUNDRED SIXTEEN THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED
SEVENTY-ONE DOLLARS AND 50/100 ($816,871.50) for attorney fees incurred
in the trial court defending against the divorce suit and related to the mandamus
actions in that suit through judgment. This portion of the judgment shall bear interest
at five percent (5%) per year, compounded annually, from the date the judgment is
signed until the amount is paid in full.
2. SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS AND 00/100 ($75,000.00), for
attorney fees to defend in the court of appeals, conditioned on Tatiana Telegina
appealing from this judgment, and the appeal being finally unsuccessful. This
portion of the judgment shall bear interest at five percent (5%) per year, compounded
2 annually, from the date the judgment of the court of appeals is final until the amount
is paid in full.
3. FIFTEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS AND 00/100 ($15,000.00) for
attorney fees to defend at the petition for review stage in the Supreme Court of
Texas, conditioned on Tatiana Telegina filing a petition for review that is denied.
This portion of the judgment shall bear interest at five percent (5%) per year,
compounded annually, from the date the judgment of the Supreme Court of Texas is
final until the amount is paid in full.
4. FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS AND 00/100 ($50,000.00) for attorney
fees to defend at the briefing stage in the Supreme Court of Texas, conditioned on
Tatiana Telegina filing a petition for review in the Supreme Court of Texas, briefing
being requested, and the appeal being unsuccessful. This portion of the judgment
shall bear interest at five percent (5%) per year, compounded annually, from the date
the judgment of the Supreme Court of Texas is final until the amount is paid in full.
5. FIFTEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS AND 00/100 ($15,000.00) for
attorney fees to defend at the oral argument stage in the Supreme Court of Texas,
conditioned on oral argument being requested, and the appeal being unsuccessful.
This portion of the judgment shall bear interest at five percent (5%) per year,
compounded annually, from the date the judgment of the Supreme Court of Texas is
3 6. TEN THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED AND FORTY-SEVEN DOLLARS
AND 00/100 ($10,647.00) for costs and expenses incurred to defend against the
divorce suit and related to the mandamus actions in that suit. This portion of the
judgment shall bear interest at five percent (5%) per year, compounded annually,
from the date the judgment is signed until the amount is paid in full.
The Court’s original opinion explaining how the Court resolved the issues
raised in the appeal remains in effect.
We order the Court’s decision certified below for observance.
AFFIRMED AS REFORMED.
W. SCOTT GOLEMON Chief Justice
Submitted on June 24, 2024 Opinion Delivered January 9, 2025
Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Chambers, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tatiana Telegina v. Valadimir Nechayuk, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tatiana-telegina-v-valadimir-nechayuk-texapp-2025.