Tatham v. . Wilson
Opinion
The exception is over-ruled. It is clearly settled, that where a husband dies, after an interlocutory decree for an account, the wife surviving, becomes entitled to the amount that may be recovered by the final decree; indeed, the wife, surviving, is entitled, although the husband should not die until after final decree; for he does not actually reduce the chose into possession by a judgment or final decree ; that can only be done by execution or payment to. the husband, and the legal effect given to a judgment or decree, is to give the husband the benefit of taking, by survivorship, in case of the wife’s death ; Nanny v. Martin,, 1 Eq. Ca. Ab. 68; McCauley v. Phillips, 4 Ves. Jun’r. 15.
Per Curiam, Decree according to report..
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
59 N.C. 250 (Tatham v. . Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.