Tate's, Inc. v. Little America Refining Co.
This text of 551 P.2d 1257 (Tate's, Inc. v. Little America Refining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case was here before (535 P.2d 1228). We reversed the judgment of the trial court which was based on an accord and satisfaction theory.
The court, on review, in accounting for any claims for damage or breach of contract came up with another judgment, that is now being attacked on appeal on the basis of insufficiency of the evidence. The evidence was somewhat controversial, but there appears to be sufficient competent, admissible evidence to support the second judgment of the trial court, and under [1258]*1258familiar rules of review we are constrained to and do affirm the judgment in this case, the parties, by stipulation, having invited the trial court and us to conclude this case on such stipulated basis.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
551 P.2d 1257, 1976 Utah LEXIS 875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tates-inc-v-little-america-refining-co-utah-1976.