Tatem v. Speakman

50 N.J. Eq. 484
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 15, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 50 N.J. Eq. 484 (Tatem v. Speakman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tatem v. Speakman, 50 N.J. Eq. 484 (N.J. 1892).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Reed, Van Syckel, Bogert, Brown, Clement, Smith—10.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Donaldson v. Madison Borough
213 A.2d 33 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1965)
In Re Mild
136 A.2d 875 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1957)
In Re the United Conclave B. L. Assn.
37 A.2d 197 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 N.J. Eq. 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tatem-v-speakman-nj-1892.