Tatem v. Southern Transportation Co.

Third Circuit

Tatem v. Southern Transportation Co.

166 F.2d 1020, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2404, 1948 A.M.C. 936

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedApril 5, 1948

DocketNo. 9460

StatusPublished

This text of 166 F.2d 1020 (Tatem v. Southern Transportation Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tatem v. Southern Transportation Co., 166 F.2d 1020, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2404, 1948 A.M.C. 936 (3d Cir. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

An examination of the briefs and consideration of the oral argument convince us that the court below committed no error in entering judgments for the plaintiffs. Irrespective of the question whether routing the tug through ocean waters for the first part of the voyage was negligent, other sufficient grounds of negligence were alleged and were proved in the court below. Accordingly the judgments, 72 F. Supp. 44, will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

An examination of the briefs and consideration of the oral argument convince us that the court below committed no error in entering judgments for the plaintiffs. Irrespective of the question whether routing the tug through ocean waters for the first part of the voyage was negligent, other sufficient grounds of negligence were alleged and were proved in the court below. Accordingly the judgments, 72 F. Supp. 44, will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 F.2d 1020, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2404, 1948 A.M.C. 936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tatem-v-southern-transportation-co-ca3-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack