Tatelbaum v. Refrigeration Discount Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Tatelbaum v. Refrigeration Discount Corp.

212 F.2d 877, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3995

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 3, 1954

Docket6781_1

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 212 F.2d 877 (Tatelbaum v. Refrigeration Discount Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tatelbaum v. Refrigeration Discount Corp., 212 F.2d 877, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3995 (4th Cir. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by a trustee in bankruptcy from an order granting reclamation of certain articles of merchandise sold to the bankrupt and covered by trust receipts issued pursuant to a trust receipt financing agreement entered into in accordance with the Maryland Trust Receipts Act, Code Maryland 1951 art. 95%, § 1 et seq. The validity of the trust receipts was attacked on the ground that they did not sufficiently describe the articles and that there had been no compliance with the provisions of the Maryland Traders Act, Code Maryland 1951 art. 2 §§ 18, 20. We think that there is no merit in either of these contentions and that the decision appealed from should be affirmed on grounds adequately stated in the opinion below, which is adopted as the opinion of this court. See, D.C., 117 F.Supp. 590.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by a trustee in bankruptcy from an order granting reclamation of certain articles of merchandise sold to the bankrupt and covered by trust receipts issued pursuant to a trust receipt financing agreement entered into in accordance with the Maryland Trust Receipts Act, Code Maryland 1951 art. 95%, § 1 et seq. The validity of the trust receipts was attacked on the ground that they did not sufficiently describe the articles and that there had been no compliance with the provisions of the Maryland Traders Act, Code Maryland 1951 art. 2 §§ 18, 20. We think that there is no merit in either of these contentions and that the decision appealed from should be affirmed on grounds adequately stated in the opinion below, which is adopted as the opinion of this court. See, D.C., 117 F.Supp. 590.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 F.2d 877, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3995, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tatelbaum-v-refrigeration-discount-corp-ca4-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack