Tate v. Whitney

Michigan Court of Chancery

Tate v. Whitney

1 Harr. Ch. 145

DecidedJanuary 11, 1839

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Harr. Ch. 145 (Tate v. Whitney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tate v. Whitney, 1 Harr. Ch. 145 (Mich. Ct. App. 1839).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chancellor.

From the bill, answer and testimony, it is apparent that the defendant was practising upon the fears of a timid and ignorant man, and that the assignment of the mortgage in question, was in fact procured without any consideration whatever. The complainant is entitled to a decree that the defendant, Whitney,, re-assign .and re-deliver said mortgage to the complainant within thirty days from the service of a copy of the decree in this cause.

Decree accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chancellor.

From the bill, answer and testimony, it is apparent that the defendant was practising upon the fears of a timid and ignorant man, and that the assignment of the mortgage in question, was in fact procured without any consideration whatever. The complainant is entitled to a decree that the defendant, Whitney,, re-assign .and re-deliver said mortgage to the complainant within thirty days from the service of a copy of the decree in this cause.

Decree accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Harr. Ch. 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tate-v-whitney-michchanct-1839.