Tate v. Touro Infirmary

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Tate v. Touro Infirmary

245 So. 3d 1027

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 15, 2018·No. No. 2018–C–0558·Published

Opinion

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.

HUGHES, J., would grant.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and assigns reasons.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and assigns reasons:

I would grant this writ application to reverse the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants in accordance with this Court's holding in Gilliam v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. , 240 La. 697, 124 So.2d 913 (1960). In my view, plaintiff has raised genuine issues of material fact as to whether the defendant lessor knew or should have known of the conditions of the leased premises that allegedly led to the plaintiff's injuries.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.

HUGHES, J., would grant.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and assigns reasons.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and assigns reasons:

I would grant this writ application to reverse the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants in accordance with this Court's holding in Gilliam v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. , 240 La. 697, 124 So.2d 913 (1960). In my view, plaintiff has raised genuine issues of material fact as to whether the defendant lessor knew or should have known of the conditions of the leased premises that allegedly led to the plaintiff's injuries.

Tate v. Touro Infirmary, 245 So. 3d 1027 (La. 2018).

Pincite

245 So. 3d 1027 (Tate v. Touro Infirmary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related