Tate v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Tate v. State

136 S.W. 65, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 618

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tate v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 55 Tex. Crim. 397 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 29, 1911·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, P. J.

This conviction was for manslaughter. There are no bills of exception in the record, nor is the transcript accompanied by a statement of facts. AH grounds of the motion for new trial refer to the ruling of the court with reference to the testimony that was admitted during the trial, and of which complaint was made. As before stated, there are no bills of exception or statement of facts in the record. These matters, therefore, cannot be revised. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, P. J.

This conviction was for manslaughter. There are no bills of exception in the record, nor is the transcript accompanied by a statement of facts. AH grounds of the motion for new trial refer to the ruling of the court with reference to the testimony that was admitted during the trial, and of which complaint was made. As before stated, there are no bills of exception or statement of facts in the record. These matters, therefore, cannot be revised. The judgment is affirmed.

Tate v. State, 136 S.W. 65, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 618 (Tex. 1911).

Pincite

136 S.W. 65 (Tate v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.