Tate v. State
103 S.E. 720, 25 Ga. App. 560, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 81
This text of 103 S.E. 720 (Tate v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tate v. State, 103 S.E. 720, 25 Ga. App. 560, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 81 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).
Opinion
This ease is here upon the sole assignment of error that the verdict was without evidence to support it. The direct and circumstantial evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict of guilty; the trial judge approved the verdict. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
103 S.E. 720, 25 Ga. App. 560, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tate-v-state-gactapp-1920.