Tate v. State
683 So. 2d 626, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12458, 1996 WL 681072
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentences. We strike, however, the words “to pay for” from condition 8 of the orders of probation because that portion is a special condition which was not orally pronounced at sentencing. Luby v. State, 648 So.2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).
Affirmed as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tate v. State, 683 So. 2d 626, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12458, 1996 WL 681072 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
683 So. 2d 626 (Tate v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Luby v. State
648 So. 2d 308 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)