Tate v. State

100 So. 926, 20 Ala. App. 698
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 3, 1924
Docket6 Div. 428.
StatusPublished

This text of 100 So. 926 (Tate v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tate v. State, 100 So. 926, 20 Ala. App. 698 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

There is no bill of exceptions, and no errors apparent on the record and the judgment is affirmed. There is a motion to quash the venire, which was overruled, but there is nothing in the record to indicate that the venire is not in strict accord with the statute in such cases made and provided. Let the judgment be.affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 So. 926, 20 Ala. App. 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tate-v-state-alactapp-1924.