Tate v. Roberts

Appellate Court of Illinois

Tate v. Roberts

173 Ill. App. 69, 1912 Ill. App. LEXIS 369

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 3, 1912

DocketGen. No. 16,901

StatusPublished

This text of 173 Ill. App. 69 (Tate v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tate v. Roberts, 173 Ill. App. 69, 1912 Ill. App. LEXIS 369 (Ill. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

■ This is before us by writ of error for review of an order of the chancellor in the Superior Court sustaining a demurrer to what is called a bill of review, filed by the plaintiff in error.

Upon an examination of the abstract of record, we do not find anything from which we can determine the character, nature or contents of the document, a demurrer to which apparently was sustained. Not a line or word of the recitals of the document is given. The only reference to it are the words “bill of review,” and nothing appears as to the grounds of the demurrer. The alleged abstract of record is merely an index. (Hughes v. Humphreys, 102 Ill. App. 194.)

We must therefore presume that the ruling of the chancellor in sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the bill was correct, and the decree is afirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI