Tate v. Phipps

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tate v. Phipps

25 A.D.2d 570, 267 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4854

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 28, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.2d 570 (Tate v. Phipps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tate v. Phipps, 25 A.D.2d 570, 267 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4854 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by an infant to recover damages for [571]*571personal injury and by his father for medical expense and loss of services, plaintiffs appeal from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 9, 1964 in favor of defendant Cheatham, upon the court’s decision dismissing the complaint as against said defendant at the end of plaintiffs’ case upon a jury trial; (2) an order of said court, entered September 2, 1964, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the judgment and for a new trial (CPLR 4404); and (3) the court’s said decision dismissing the complaint. Appeal from decision dismissed. No appeal lies from a decision. Judgment and order affirmed, without costs. No opinion.

Brennan, Acting P. J., Hill, Rabin, Hoptins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by an infant to recover damages for [571]*571personal injury and by his father for medical expense and loss of services, plaintiffs appeal from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 9, 1964 in favor of defendant Cheatham, upon the court’s decision dismissing the complaint as against said defendant at the end of plaintiffs’ case upon a jury trial; (2) an order of said court, entered September 2, 1964, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the judgment and for a new trial (CPLR 4404); and (3) the court’s said decision dismissing the complaint. Appeal from decision dismissed. No appeal lies from a decision. Judgment and order affirmed, without costs. No opinion.

Brennan, Acting P. J., Hill, Rabin, Hoptins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.2d 570, 267 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tate-v-phipps-nyappdiv-1966.