Tate v. . Phillips

77 N.C. 126
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 5, 1877·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PearsoN, C. J.

This case is governed by Graham v. Tate .ante, 120.

A plaintiff may at any time before verdict pay the cost and take a nonsuit except in a cáse where the defendant has .acquired a right to affirmative relief.

The defendant in our case under the statute had no more •than a defensive right against Tate, i. e. to bar the action by a set off of the notes of the Bank, but he could not claim of the plaintiff judgment for the excess.

So according to the course of the Court the plaintiff had a right to pay up the cost and walk out of Court.

The suggestion that he intends to take proceedings in the Federal Court under the Act of Bankruptcy is a matter about which w7e have no concern.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tate v. . Phillips, 77 N.C. 126 (N.C. 1877).

77 N.C. 126 (Tate v. . Phillips) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Campbell v. Washington Light & Power Co.
82 S.E. 842 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1914)
Brown v. . King
12 S.E. 137 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1890)
Wharton v. Commissioners of Currituck
82 N.C. 11 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1880)
Purnell v. Vaughan, Barnes & Co.
80 N.C. 46 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1879)