Tate v. NC Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Charlotte, Inc.
This text of 473 F. App'x 245 (Tate v. NC Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Charlotte, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Benjamin Tate appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for the Appellee on Tate’s claims of disability and race discrimination and intentional infliction of emotional distress. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tate v. NC Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co., No. 3:09-cv-00036-MOC-DSC, 2011 WL 3813175 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
473 F. App'x 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tate-v-nc-pepsi-cola-bottling-co-of-charlotte-inc-ca4-2012.