Tate v. NC Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Charlotte, Inc.

473 F. App'x 245
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 11, 2012·No. No. 11-2058·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin Tate appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for the Appellee on Tate’s claims of disability and race discrimination and intentional infliction of emotional distress. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tate v. NC Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co., No. 3:09-cv-00036-MOC-DSC, 2011 WL 3813175 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tate v. NC Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Charlotte, Inc., 473 F. App'x 245 (4th Cir. 2012).

473 F. App'x 245 (Tate v. NC Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Charlotte, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stark v. Hartt Transportation Systems, Inc.
37 F. Supp. 3d 445 (D. Maine, 2014)