Tate v. Moore

802 So. 2d 1157, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16429, 2001 WL 1472661
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 21, 2001
DocketNo. 3D01-2119
StatusPublished

This text of 802 So. 2d 1157 (Tate v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tate v. Moore, 802 So. 2d 1157, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16429, 2001 WL 1472661 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant seeks a writ of habeas corpus. We deny the petition, as defendant is not entitled to relief under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). See Dunenas v. Moore, 762 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (holding that where negotiated plea not conditioned upon sentencing guidelines and does not exceed statutory maximum, sentence not unlawful under Heggs).

Petition denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dunenas v. Moore
762 So. 2d 1007 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
802 So. 2d 1157, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16429, 2001 WL 1472661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tate-v-moore-fladistctapp-2001.