Tate v. Ludeau

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Tate v. Ludeau

186 So. 27, 191 La. 558, 1938 La. LEXIS 1395

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tate v. Ludeau. Read the opinion of the Court — 195 La. 954 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 28, 1938·No. No. 34877.·Published

Opinion

O’NIELL, Chief Justice.

The issue in this case is the same as in the case of Mrs. Emma Rosa Tate Fontenot v. Emile Ludeau et al., La.Sup., 186 So. 21.1 For the reasons given in the opinion rendered in that case, the judgment appealed from in this case is annulled, and the case is ordered remanded to the district court *559 for further proceedings consistent with the opinion referred to. The defendants are to pay the costs of this appeal. The liability for all other court costs is to abide the final disposition of the case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O’NIELL, Chief Justice.

The issue in this case is the same as in the case of Mrs. Emma Rosa Tate Fontenot v. Emile Ludeau et al., La.Sup., 186 So. 21.1 For the reasons given in the opinion rendered in that case, the judgment appealed from in this case is annulled, and the case is ordered remanded to the district court *559 for further proceedings consistent with the opinion referred to. The defendants are to pay the costs of this appeal. The liability for all other court costs is to abide the final disposition of the case.

Tate v. Ludeau, 186 So. 27, 191 La. 558, 1938 La. LEXIS 1395 (La. 1938).

Pincite

186 So. 27 (Tate v. Ludeau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related