Tate v. Christy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Tate v. Christy

454 S.E.2d 242, 339 N.C. 731, 1995 N.C. LEXIS 99

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedMarch 3, 1995

DocketNo. 171A94

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 454 S.E.2d 242 (Tate v. Christy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tate v. Christy, 454 S.E.2d 242, 339 N.C. 731, 1995 N.C. LEXIS 99 (N.C. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Justice Orr recused and took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Nesbit v. Howard, 333 N.C. 782, 429 S.E.2d 730 (1993).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Justice Orr recused and took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Nesbit v. Howard, 333 N.C. 782, 429 S.E.2d 730 (1993).

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

454 S.E.2d 242, 339 N.C. 731, 1995 N.C. LEXIS 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tate-v-christy-nc-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack