Tate v. Christy

454 S.E.2d 242, 339 N.C. 731, 1995 N.C. LEXIS 99
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 3, 1995·No. No. 171A94·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Justice Orr recused and took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Nesbit v. Howard, 333 N.C. 782, 429 S.E.2d 730 (1993).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tate v. Christy, 454 S.E.2d 242, 339 N.C. 731, 1995 N.C. LEXIS 99 (N.C. 1995).

454 S.E.2d 242 (Tate v. Christy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wise v. Valley Bank
861 So. 2d 1029 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2003)
Clara Wise v. Valley Bank
Mississippi Supreme Court, 2000