Tate v. . Board of Education

135 S.E. 336, 192 N.C. 516, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 337
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 10, 1926
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 135 S.E. 336 (Tate v. . Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tate v. . Board of Education, 135 S.E. 336, 192 N.C. 516, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 337 (N.C. 1926).

Opinion

CoNNOR, J.

Prior to the commencement of this action, the board of education of McDowell County, at a regular meeting, duly adopted a resolution, relative to the needs of certain school districts in said county, with respect to schoolhouses required for the maintenance in each of said districts of a six-months school in compliance with the provisions of section 3 of Article IN of the Constitution of North Carolina. The said board caused a copy of said resolution to be certified to the board of commissioners of McDowell County. The said resolution is embodied in a resolution thereafter adopted by the said board of commissioners, a copy of which is attached to and forms a part of the complaint in this action.

In its resolution, the board of commissioners recites that it has been requested by the board of education of the county to provide funds for the erection in each of four school districts in McDowell County, of a schoolhouse in which a public school for said district shall be taught for a term of six months in every year; that said board of education has found and determined, as appears by its resolution certified to the board of commissioners, that in neither of said school districts is there a schoolhouse adequate or sufficient for the maintenance in said school district of such school; that neither the said board of education nor the said districts have funds, or means of raising funds to defray the expense' of erecting schoolhouses in said districts necessary or adequate for the maintenance therein of a public school as required by the Constitution of North Carolina; that the total sum required for the erection in said school districts of schoolhouses necessary or adequate for the maintenance of such schools is $270,000.

The board of commissioners thereupon finds and determines “that the present facilities and buildings in those-school districts in McDowell County, North Carolina, known as Cross Mill District, Montford Cove *518 Consolidated School District, Old Fort School District, and Clinch-field School District, are inadequate and insufficient for maintaining a six-months school term, and that the amounts specified in the foregoing resolution of the board of education of McDowell County required for the buildings necessary for maintaining a six-months term of school in the respective districts, is fair and reasonable.”

The said board of commissioners further finds and determines “that the building for maintaining a six-months term of school in the several districts of McDowell County, North Carolina, and in those districts hereinbefore named is a public necessity which the county is required to provide under the provisions of the Constitution of North Carolina.”

It is thereupon resolved by the said board of commissioners of McDowell County:

“Section 3. That the county board of education of McDowell County, North Carolina, be, and it is hereby authorized and empowered to proceed to provide the necessary buildings in the Cross Mill District, in the Montford Cove Consolidated School District, in the Old Fort District, and in the Clinchfield School District, for maintaining a six-months school term in accord with this resolution, within the limits of the amounts specified herein in the respective districts.

Sec. 5. The bonds in the aggregate amount of $210,000 shall be issued, and the issuance thereof is hereby ordered under and by virtue of the power given to the county board of commissioners under and by virtue of the power and direction granted under the Constitution of North Carolina, for the purpose of' providing the necessary and adequate buildings for maintaining of a six-months term in the several districts of McDowell County, North Carolina, especially in those several districts as follows: In Cross Mill School District, in Montford Cove District, in Old Fort School District and in Clinchfield School District, in McDowell County, North Carolina.

Sec. 6. That the said bonds shall be issued and executed in the name of McDowell County, and shall be signed by the chairman of the board of county commissioners, with the corporate seal of the said county affixed and attested by the clerk of the board of county commissioners, and the coupons shall be attached to the said bonds and shall bear the printed or lithographed fac simile of the signatures of the said chairman and the said clerk.

Sec. 9. That a tax sufficient to pay the interest on said bonds as same matures and to create a sinking fund with which to pay the principal of said bonds at maturity as same matures, shall be annually levied and collected.”

It will be noted by reference to the resolution of the board of commissioners, set out in the complaint, that neither the board of commis *519 sioners nor tbe board of education, recite therein any statutory authority for the issuance or sale of said bonds, or for the incurring of said indebtedness on behalf of McDowell County, for the erection of schoolhouses in the school districts of said county, found by both boards to be necessary for the maintenance of public schools in said districts for the term required by the Constitution. The board of commissioners, in authorizing the board of education to cause said schoolhouses to be erected, and in ordering the issuance of said bonds, and directing the levying of a tax for the payment of interest and principal to be due thereon, purport to act solely under and by virtue of provisions of the Constitution of North Carolina. The allegation in the complaint that the board of commissioners is without authority, by virtue of any statute enacted by the General Assembly of North Carolina, to authorize the erection of said schoolhouse, the issuance and sale of said bonds, or the levying of said tax as provided in its resolution, is admitted by defendants in their demurrer.

It is the contention of defendants that the board of commissioners of McDowell County has authority under the Constitution of North Carolina to provide funds, by the issuance of bonds of the county, or otherwise, for the erection of schoolhouses in the several school districts of their county, required for the maintenance of schools therein for six months in every year, upon their finding that such schoolhouses are necessary for that purpose, and that no statute, enacted by the General Assembly of the State authorizing the issuance of said bonds or the levying of said tax is required. The absence of such statute applicable to McDowell County is conceded. This contention involves the only question presented by the pleadings in this case. Judge McElroy, having heard the cause, upon defendants’ demurrer, pursuant to a stipulation signed by attorneys for both plaintiff and defendants, was of the opinion that defendants are without power under-the Constitution of North Carolina to create the indebtedness provided for in the resolution, and that the board of commissioners of McDowell County is without authority of law to issue said bonds or to levy said táx, as provided in the resolution, for that it was not authorized so to do by any statute of the General Assembly; pursuant to this opinion, it was considered, ordered and adjudged that the demurrer be and the same was overruled. It was further considered, ordered and adjudged that defendants be and they were enjoined, in accordance with the prayer of the complaint.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bridges Ex Rel. City of Charlotte v. City of Charlotte
20 S.E.2d 825 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)
Harrell v. . Commissioners of Wilson
173 S.E. 614 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
Evans v. . Mecklenburg County
172 S.E. 323 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
Board of Education v. . Walter
151 S.E. 718 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
Hartsfield v. . Craven County
139 S.E. 698 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)
Frazier v. Board of Commissioners
138 S.E. 433 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)
Lacy v. . Bank
111 S.E. 612 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 S.E. 336, 192 N.C. 516, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tate-v-board-of-education-nc-1926.