Tate, N. v. PBPP

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 26, 2018·No. 124 EM 2018·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

NORMAN TATE, : No. 124 EM 2018 :

Petitioner : : :

v. : : :

PA BOARD OF PROBATION AND : PAROLE, : :

Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of November, 2018, the “Motion for Leave to File Notice

of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc” is GRANTED. Petitioner has 30 days in which to file his notice

of appeal and jurisdictional statement. See Pa.R.A.P. 909, 910 (providing that, with

respect to appeals to the Supreme Court, the appellant shall file a jurisdictional statement

along with the notice of appeal; further delineating the content and form of the

jurisdictional statement).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tate, N. v. PBPP, (Pa. 2018).

Tate, N. v. PBPP (Tate, N. v. PBPP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.