Tate, N. v. PBPP
This text of Tate, N. v. PBPP (Tate, N. v. PBPP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
NORMAN TATE, : No. 124 EM 2018 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : PA BOARD OF PROBATION AND : PAROLE, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 26th day of November, 2018, the “Motion for Leave to File Notice
of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc” is GRANTED. Petitioner has 30 days in which to file his notice
of appeal and jurisdictional statement. See Pa.R.A.P. 909, 910 (providing that, with
respect to appeals to the Supreme Court, the appellant shall file a jurisdictional statement
along with the notice of appeal; further delineating the content and form of the
jurisdictional statement).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tate, N. v. PBPP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tate-n-v-pbpp-pa-2018.