Tatas v. Ali Baba's Terrace, Inc.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MEHMET EMIN TATAS, Plaintiff, – against – ORDER ALI BABA’S TERRACE, INC., ALI RIZA 19 Civ. 10595 (ER) DOGAN, SENOL BAKIR, and TOLGAHAN SUBAKAN,
Defendants.
Ramos, D.J.: The Court is in receipt of Defendants’ notice of Ali Baba’s bankruptcy and motion to extend the automatic stay to the individual defendants. The motion is GRANTED. First, the Court acknowledges that Ali Baba’s filed for bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, under Case No. 21-bk-11550 (JLG). Therefore, this matter is automatically stayed as to Ali Baba’s pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(a). Second, the Court finds that it is appropriate to extend the stay to the individual defendants. Counsel for Defendants has submitted evidence showing that all Defendants have received coverage under Ali Baba’s insurance policy. See Doc. 105-2. Numerous courts in this Circuit have found that enjoining actions as to individual, non-debtor defendants is appropriate when doing so would prevent the depletion of the debtor’s assets, including a shared insurance policy. See, e.g., In re Quigley Co., Inc., 676 F.3d 45, 57–58 (2d Cir. 2012). Accordingly, the Court will stay this action in its entirety.1
1 Defendants’ request for a temporary stay pending resolution of this motion is therefore denied as moot. Defendants are instructed to notify the Court within 48 hours of the resolution of Ali Baba’s bankruptcy proceedings. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to stay this case.
It is SO ORDERED. Dated: September 16, 2021 ty } | 4 New York, New York FE bt \—— EDGARDO RAMOS, U.S.D.J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tatas v. Ali Baba's Terrace, Inc. (Tatas v. Ali Baba's Terrace, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.