Tatarsky v. Wavecrest Building Corp.
This text of 268 A.D. 885 (Tatarsky v. Wavecrest Building Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action by plaintiff, a licensed real estate broker, for commissions earned, and to recover damages for a conspiracy to deprive him of commissions, defendants appeal from an order denying their motion to dismiss the third cause of action for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
268 A.D. 885, 51 N.Y.S.2d 95, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4036, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tatarsky-v-wavecrest-building-corp-nyappdiv-1944.