Tataii v. Nago
This text of Tataii v. Nago (Tataii v. Nago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCOT-XX-XXXXXXX 25-AUG-2020 07:56 AM
SCOT-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
STEVE TATAII, Plaintiff,
vs.
SCOTT T. NAGO, in his capacity as Chief Election Officer, State of Hawai#i, Defendant.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CIV. NO. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge Remigio, assigned by reason of vacancy)
Upon consideration of plaintiff Steve Tataii’s
“Election Complaint,” filed on August 4, 2020, the documents
attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the
record, it appears that this court lacks jurisdiction to consider
the complaint. See HRS § 602-5; see also HRS §§ 11-172 and 12-8.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint is dismissed.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, August 25, 2020.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Catherine H. Remigio
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tataii v. Nago, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tataii-v-nago-haw-2020.