Tastee Donuts, Inc. v. Price

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 28, 1993
Docket92-3728
StatusPublished

This text of Tastee Donuts, Inc. v. Price (Tastee Donuts, Inc. v. Price) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tastee Donuts, Inc. v. Price, (5th Cir. 1993).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals,

Fifth Circuit.

No. 92-3728

Summary Calendar.

In the Matter of TASTEE DONUTS, INC., Debtor Tastee Donuts, Inc., Appellant,

v.

Linda Leaumont PRICE, Wife of/and Thomas L. Price, Appellees.

May 6, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

Before REAVLEY, JONES and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:

One question of law determines the outcome of this appeal: whether the prohibition against

covenants not to compete contai ned in LA.REV.STAT.ANN. § 23:921 (West 1985)1 applies to

franchise contracts in the absence of an employment relationship between the contracting parties. The

district court held that the section 921 prohibition applied to covenants not to compete in franchise

agreements that create no employment relationship. The court only cited Fine v. Property Damage

Appraisers, Inc., 393 F.Supp. 1304, 1311 (E.D.La.1975) in support of its decision. No Louisiana

court has followed Fine's discussion concerning the scope of section 921. But a Louisiana court has

held to the contrary: "[section] 921 applies only to persons in employee-employer relationships and

will not be extended to other relationships by judicial construction or interpretation." Simpson v.

Kelly Services, Inc., 339 So.2d 490, 495 (La.App. 2d Cir.1976), writ denied, 341 So.2d 1121

(La.1977); see also NAPASCO Int'l, Inc., Western Div. v. Maxson, 420 So.2d 1276, 1278-79

(La.App. 3d Cir.1982) (agreeing with Simpson as to the limited scope of section 921, but finding an

employment relationship); cf. Winston v. Bourgeois, Bennett, Thokey and Hickey, 432 So.2d 936,

1 In 1991, Louisiana's legislature excluded franchise contracts from the scope of section 921, see id. § 921(E) (West Supp.1993), but the parties executed the contract at issue in this case before 1991. See Alexandria Anesthesia Serv. v. Firmin, 576 So.2d 1236, 1237 (La.App. 3d Cir.1991) (Amendments to section 921 are not retroactive.). 940 (La.App. 4th Cir.1983) (Louisiana courts will examine the actual nature of the relationship

between contracting parties to decide whether section 921 applies, regardless of the contract form

or the contracting party's title.). This court has followed Simpson in deciding that section 921 does

not govern independent-contractor relationships. Taquino v. Teledyne Monarch Rubber, 893 F.2d

1488, 1497-98 (5th Cir.1990).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fine v. Property Damage Appraisers, Inc.
393 F. Supp. 1304 (E.D. Louisiana, 1975)
Alexandria Anesthesia Service v. Firmin
576 So. 2d 1236 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1991)
Winston v. Bourgeois, Bennett, Thokey and Hickey
432 So. 2d 936 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1983)
NAPASCO INTERN., INC., WESTERN DIV. v. Maxson
420 So. 2d 1276 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1982)
Simpson v. Kelly Services, Inc.
339 So. 2d 490 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1977)
Taquino v. Teledyne Monarch Rubber
893 F.2d 1488 (Fifth Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tastee Donuts, Inc. v. Price, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tastee-donuts-inc-v-price-ca5-1993.