Tashia Williams v. Shonda Copeland

Opinion

Opinion issued December 17, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

of the parties, but because there is no certificate of conference, the Court held this

motion to allow appellees the opportunity to object. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a).

Appellees have not responded to the motion.

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a)(1). Any other pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Guerra.

Tashia Williams filed a letter concerning mediation and stated that she has “parted ways with my previous legal [counsel] and am currently in the process of securing new counsel to assist me in this matter.” No letter of appearance or motion to substitute has been filed.

Footnotes

1. NO. 01-24-00213-CV ——————————— TASHIA WILLIAMS, Appellant V. ALLSTATE TEXAS LLOYDS, RAINBOW INTERNATIONAL, LLC, AND SHONDA COPELAND, Appellees On Appeal from the 400th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 23-DCV-304746 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Tashia Williams, proceeding pro se, has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.1 Appellant states that the dismissal of the appeal is with the agreement 1 According to this Court’s records, appellant is represented by retained counsel Rachel Martin-Deckelmann. No motion to withdraw has been filed. However,