Tasha Renee Norman v. Pinkerton Properties
This text of Tasha Renee Norman v. Pinkerton Properties (Tasha Renee Norman v. Pinkerton Properties) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00251-CV ___________________________
TASHA RENEE NORMAN, Appellant
V.
PINKERTON PROPERTIES, Appellee
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018-003893-1
Before Sudderth, C.J.; Gabriel and Kerr, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
On January 4, 2019, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as
the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could
dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with
the court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the
brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b),
38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.
Because appellant has failed to file a brief despite the opportunity to explain the
initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P.
38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Per Curiam
Delivered: February 7, 2019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tasha Renee Norman v. Pinkerton Properties, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tasha-renee-norman-v-pinkerton-properties-texapp-2019.