Tarzy v. United Piece Dye Works
146 A. 926, 7 N.J. Misc. 501, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 278
This text of 146 A. 926 (Tarzy v. United Piece Dye Works) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tarzy v. United Piece Dye Works, 146 A. 926, 7 N.J. Misc. 501, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 278 (N.J. 1929).
Opinion
In an action for negligence the defendant has a verdict, and under this rule the plaintiff seeks to set it aside for the reasons:
1. It is against the weight of the evidence.
2. It is contrary to the charge of the court.
3. It indicates prejudice and partiality.
There was a fair dispute of facts presented by the proofs and our examination thereof does not bring us to the conclusion that the verdict was the result of mistake, prejudice or passion, and therefore the rule to show cause is discharged, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
146 A. 926, 7 N.J. Misc. 501, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tarzy-v-united-piece-dye-works-nj-1929.