Tarver v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tarver v. State

788 So. 2d 1095, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8303, 2001 WL 686876

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tarver v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10095 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 20, 2001·No. No. 4D01-418·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the summary denial of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief, wherein he alleges that his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to call him to testify at the pretrial hearing on his motion to suppress his confession, and remand for the attachment of portions of the [1096]*1096record conclusively refuting his claim or for an evidentiary hearing.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

POLEN, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the summary denial of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief, wherein he alleges that his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to call him to testify at the pretrial hearing on his motion to suppress his confession, and remand for the attachment of portions of the [1096]*1096record conclusively refuting his claim or for an evidentiary hearing.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

POLEN, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Tarver v. State, 788 So. 2d 1095, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8303, 2001 WL 686876 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

788 So. 2d 1095 (Tarver v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.