Tarver v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Tarver v. State

101 So. 926, 20 Ala. App. 698

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided September 2, 1924·No. 2 Div. 299.·Published

Opinion

FOSTER, J.

The appellant was convicted for having in possession a still to be used for manufacturing prohibited liquors. No exceptions were reserved to the admission of evidence. The only question raised in the record is the refusal of the court to give charge 2. This charge is covered by given charge 1 and the oral charge of the court. There is no error in the record. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOSTER, J.

The appellant was convicted for having in possession a still to be used for manufacturing prohibited liquors. No exceptions were reserved to the admission of evidence. The only question raised in the record is the refusal of the court to give charge 2. This charge is covered by given charge 1 and the oral charge of the court. There is no error in the record. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed. Affirmed.

Tarver v. State, 101 So. 926, 20 Ala. App. 698 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

101 So. 926 (Tarver v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.