Tarver v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Tarver v. State

101 So. 926, 20 Ala. App. 698

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 2, 1924

Docket2 Div. 299.

StatusPublished

This text of 101 So. 926 (Tarver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tarver v. State, 101 So. 926, 20 Ala. App. 698 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

FOSTER, J.

The appellant was convicted for having in possession a still to be used for manufacturing prohibited liquors. No exceptions were reserved to the admission of evidence. The only question raised in the record is the refusal of the court to give charge 2. This charge is covered by given charge 1 and the oral charge of the court. There is no error in the record. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOSTER, J.

The appellant was convicted for having in possession a still to be used for manufacturing prohibited liquors. No exceptions were reserved to the admission of evidence. The only question raised in the record is the refusal of the court to give charge 2. This charge is covered by given charge 1 and the oral charge of the court. There is no error in the record. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 So. 926, 20 Ala. App. 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tarver-v-state-alactapp-1924.