Tartar v. Burford
Opinion
Petitioner alleges that he is illegally detained and imprisoned in the State Penitentiary, upon conyiction for the crime of forgery in the district court of Woods county, wherein he was sentenced to serve a term of five years imprisonment, for two reasons: First, the evidence was insufficient to show the defendant had any personal knowledge of the forged character of the check. Second, the instructions of the court were insufficient.
These two questions are matters of law which can only be presented on appeal. The guilt or innocence of one accused of crime will not be inquired into on habeas corpus. In re Jones, 92 Okla. Cr. 443, 224 P. 2d 280.
The writ is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1951 OK CR 15 (Tartar v. Burford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.