Tartar v. Burford

1951 OK CR 15, 227 P.2d 422, 93 Okla. Crim. 281, 1951 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 216
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided January 24, 1951·No. A-11464·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

JONES, J.

Petitioner alleges that he is illegally detained and imprisoned in the State Penitentiary, upon conyiction for the crime of forgery in the district court of Woods county, wherein he was sentenced to serve a term of five years imprisonment, for two reasons: First, the evidence was insufficient to show the defendant had any personal knowledge of the forged character of the check. Second, the instructions of the court were insufficient.

These two questions are matters of law which can only be presented on appeal. The guilt or innocence of one accused of crime will not be inquired into on habeas corpus. In re Jones, 92 Okla. Cr. 443, 224 P. 2d 280.

The writ is denied.

BRETT, P. J., and POWELL, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tartar v. Burford, 1951 OK CR 15, 227 P.2d 422, 93 Okla. Crim. 281, 1951 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 216 (Okla. Ct. App. 1951).

1951 OK CR 15 (Tartar v. Burford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Best v. State
1964 OK CR 45 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1964)
Application of Mitchell
1964 OK CR 20 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1964)
Manley v. Raines
1959 OK CR 128 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1959)
Skinner v. Raines
1959 OK CR 93 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1959)
Ex parte Bridges
1958 OK CR 23 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1958)
Peoples v. McLeod
1957 OK CR 12 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1957)
Application of Brown
1956 OK CR 56 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1956)
Ex Parte Giles
1953 OK CR 149 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1953)