Tart v. Sellers

Fourth Circuit

Tart v. Sellers

569 F. App'x 143

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 28, 2014·No. No. 13-7948·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Larry R. Tart appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012), and his motion to amend his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tart v. Sellers, No. 1:13-cv-00282-FDW, 2013 WL 5937413 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 22, 2013). We deny Tart’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[144] fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Larry R. Tart appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012), and his motion to amend his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tart v. Sellers, No. 1:13-cv-00282-FDW, 2013 WL 5937413 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 22, 2013). We deny Tart’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[144] fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Tart v. Sellers, 569 F. App'x 143 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

569 F. App'x 143 (Tart v. Sellers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related