Tarrant v. Jacoboni

766 So. 2d 338, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6829, 2000 WL 725299
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 7, 2000·No. No. 3D99-3212·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm that part of the trial court’s order which imposes monetary sanctions against the appellants and their counsel. See Farish v. Lum’s, Inc., 267 So.2d 325 (Fla.1972); Elder v. Norton, 711 So.2d 586 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).

However, based upon the lack of specific findings to support the amount awarded, we reverse and remand for rehearing solely upon the amount awarded, we reverse and remand for rehearing solely upon the amount of the sanction imposed. See Nordyne v. Florida Mobile Home Supply, 625 So.2d 1283 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), review dismissed, 630 So.2d 1100 (Fla.1993); Beauchamp v. Collins, 500 So.2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Sun-Crete of Florida, Inc. v. Sun Deck Products, Inc., 472 So.2d 520 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

[339] Affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tarrant v. Jacoboni, 766 So. 2d 338, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6829, 2000 WL 725299 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

766 So. 2d 338 (Tarrant v. Jacoboni) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nordyne v. Florida Mobile Home Supply
625 So. 2d 1283 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Beauchamp v. Collins
500 So. 2d 294 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Elder v. Norton
711 So. 2d 586 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Farish v. Lum's, Inc.
267 So. 2d 325 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)
Sun-Crete of Florida, Inc. v. Sun Deck Products, Inc.
472 So. 2d 520 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)