Tarrant v. Board of Trustees of New York City Fire Department Article 1-B Pension Fund

223 A.D.2d 647, 637 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 437

This text of 223 A.D.2d 647 (Tarrant v. Board of Trustees of New York City Fire Department Article 1-B Pension Fund) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tarrant v. Board of Trustees of New York City Fire Department Article 1-B Pension Fund, 223 A.D.2d 647, 637 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 437 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determina[648]*648tion of the Board of Trustees of the New York City Fire Department Article 1-B Pension Fund dated November 19, 1993, which denied the petitioner accident disability retirement benefits and awarded him ordinary disability benefits, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), entered October 14, 1994, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner contends that he is entitled to an accident disability pension because his hearing loss was caused by a service-related accident on November 5, 1973. However, the petitioner’s own physician, Michael Katz, M.D., in a report dated May 14, 1993, indicated only that the tinnitus and hearing loss suffered by the petitioner "could have resulted from the injury that the patient reported”. Considering the report, along with all the other evidence in the record, we cannot conclude that the respondent Board of Trustees of the New York City Fire Department Article 1-B Pension Fund acted arbitrarily and capriciously or illegally in deciding that the petitioner had failed to meet his burden of showing that his current disability was either caused or precipitated by the November 5, 1973, accident. The evidence in the record does not establish, as a matter of law, that such a causal relationship existed (see generally, Matter of Canfora v Board of Trustees, 60 NY2d 347; Matter of Daly v Board of Trustees, 190 AD2d 848, 849). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Canfora v. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund
457 N.E.2d 740 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Daly v. Board of Trustees
190 A.D.2d 848 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
223 A.D.2d 647, 637 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tarrant-v-board-of-trustees-of-new-york-city-fire-department-article-1-b-nyappdiv-1996.