Tarrant County v. Lively

25 Tex. 399
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 25 Tex. 399 (Tarrant County v. Lively) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tarrant County v. Lively, 25 Tex. 399 (Tex. 1860).

Opinion

Wheeler, O. J.

—The court did not err in refusing to sot aside the judgment by default. The defendant showed excuse, which can be recognised as of any validity, for the failure to plead in time. (Dowell v. Winters, 20 Tex., 793.)

The judgment by default established the cause of action, and left nothing remaining hut to assess the damages. As the amount was evidenced by writing, there was no necessity for a jury. The rulings of the court upon evidence touching questions which had been established by the default are immaterial, and need not he revised.

There is no error in the judgment, and it is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. Biotectronics, Inc.
937 S.W.2d 38 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)
San Antonio Paper Co. v. Morgan
53 S.W.2d 651 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Milford v. Culpepper
40 S.W.2d 163 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Citizens' Bank v. Brandau
1 S.W.2d 466 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Ball v. Nelms
293 S.W. 335 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Love v. Allard
286 S.W. 581 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1926)
Horton v. New Pass Gold & Silver Mining Co.
27 P. 376 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1891)
Houston v. Musgrove
35 Tex. 594 (Texas Supreme Court, 1872)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Tex. 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tarrant-county-v-lively-tex-1860.