Home/First Circuit/Tarr v. Rosenstein

Tarr v. Rosenstein

53 F. 112, 3 C.C.A. 466, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1456
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedOctober 19, 1892
DocketNo. 34
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 53 F. 112 (Tarr v. Rosenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tarr v. Rosenstein, 53 F. 112, 3 C.C.A. 466, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1456 (1st Cir. 1892).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the learned circuit judge who decided this case in the court below, for the reasons stated in his opinion, that the trustee proceedings afft >rd no ground for withholding from the defendants in error the benefit of the supersedeas bond, and that they are entitled to interest on the full amount of the decree entered June 28, 1890, without deduction on account of the trustee proceedings. Judgment affirmed, with interest and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. v. Hurley
151 F.2d 751 (First Circuit, 1945)
Spruks v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
138 F.2d 812 (Third Circuit, 1943)
Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Davis
127 F.2d 780 (Fourth Circuit, 1942)
Martin v. Clarke
105 F.2d 685 (Seventh Circuit, 1939)
Bankers Surety Co. v. Security Trust Co.
39 App. D.C. 354 (D.C. Circuit, 1912)
American Surety Co. of New York v. North Packing & Provision Co.
178 F. 810 (First Circuit, 1910)
Wood v. Brown
104 F. 203 (Eighth Circuit, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 F. 112, 3 C.C.A. 466, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tarr-v-rosenstein-ca1-1892.