Tarr v. Rosenstein
53 F. 112, 3 C.C.A. 466, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1456
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided October 19, 1892·No. No. 34·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
We agree with the learned circuit judge who decided this case in the court below, for the reasons stated in his opinion, that the trustee proceedings afft >rd no ground for withholding from the defendants in error the benefit of the supersedeas bond, and that they are entitled to interest on the full amount of the decree entered June 28, 1890, without deduction on account of the trustee proceedings. Judgment affirmed, with interest and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tarr v. Rosenstein, 53 F. 112, 3 C.C.A. 466, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1456 (1st Cir. 1892).
53 F. 112 (Tarr v. Rosenstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. v. Hurley
151 F.2d 751 (First Circuit, 1945)
Spruks v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
138 F.2d 812 (Third Circuit, 1943)
Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Davis
127 F.2d 780 (Fourth Circuit, 1942)
Martin v. Clarke
105 F.2d 685 (Seventh Circuit, 1939)
Bankers Surety Co. v. Security Trust Co.
39 App. D.C. 354 (D.C. Circuit, 1912)
American Surety Co. of New York v. North Packing & Provision Co.
178 F. 810 (First Circuit, 1910)
Wood v. Brown
104 F. 203 (Eighth Circuit, 1900)