Tarr v. F. Schumacher & Co.
524 N.E.2d 148, 71 N.Y.2d 950, 528 N.Y.S.2d 828, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 649
This text of 524 N.E.2d 148 (Tarr v. F. Schumacher & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tarr v. F. Schumacher & Co., 524 N.E.2d 148, 71 N.Y.2d 950, 528 N.Y.S.2d 828, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 649 (N.Y. 1988).
Opinion
Motion insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order of affirmance dismissed as untimely. Motion insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying reargument dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
524 N.E.2d 148, 71 N.Y.2d 950, 528 N.Y.S.2d 828, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tarr-v-f-schumacher-co-ny-1988.