Tarr v. Chicago Insurance Co.
680 So. 2d 594, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9790, 1996 WL 525885
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 18, 1996·No. No. 95-1749·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Affirmed. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Kilbreath, 419 So.2d 632 (Fla.1982)(statute of limitations on uninsured motorist claims begins to run on date of accident); cf. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Lee, 678 So.2d 818 (Fla.1996)(statute of limitations on personal injury protection benefits starts to run on insurer’s breach of obligation to pay).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tarr v. Chicago Insurance Co., 680 So. 2d 594, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9790, 1996 WL 525885 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
680 So. 2d 594 (Tarr v. Chicago Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Christoff v. Hartford Insurance Co. of Midwest
963 So. 2d 292 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)