Tarr v. Chicago Insurance Co.
680 So. 2d 594, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9790, 1996 WL 525885
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 18, 1996
DocketNo. 95-1749
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 680 So. 2d 594 (Tarr v. Chicago Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tarr v. Chicago Insurance Co., 680 So. 2d 594, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9790, 1996 WL 525885 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
Opinion
Affirmed. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Kilbreath, 419 So.2d 632 (Fla.1982)(statute of limitations on uninsured motorist claims begins to run on date of accident); cf. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Lee, 678 So.2d 818 (Fla.1996)(statute of limitations on personal injury protection benefits starts to run on insurer’s breach of obligation to pay).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Christoff v. Hartford Insurance Co. of Midwest
963 So. 2d 292 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
680 So. 2d 594, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9790, 1996 WL 525885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tarr-v-chicago-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1996.