Tarquinio v. Diglio

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Tarquinio v. Diglio

374 A.2d 257, 173 Conn. 758

DecidedJune 7, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 374 A.2d 257 (Tarquinio v. Diglio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tarquinio v. Diglio, 374 A.2d 257, 173 Conn. 758 (Colo. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

It appearing that the defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to defend against the plaintiff’s appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that unless the defendant files his brief on or before August 1,1977, the judgment be set aside and the case remanded with direction to render judgment for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appearing that the defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to defend against the plaintiff’s appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that unless the defendant files his brief on or before August 1,1977, the judgment be set aside and the case remanded with direction to render judgment for the plaintiff.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

374 A.2d 257, 173 Conn. 758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tarquinio-v-diglio-conn-1977.