Tarquinio v. Diglio
374 A.2d 257, 173 Conn. 758
Opinion
It appearing that the defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to defend against the plaintiff’s appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that unless the defendant files his brief on or before August 1,1977, the judgment be set aside and the case remanded with direction to render judgment for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tarquinio v. Diglio, 374 A.2d 257, 173 Conn. 758 (Colo. 1977).
374 A.2d 257 (Tarquinio v. Diglio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.