Tarpley v. Moyer

Fourth Circuit

Tarpley v. Moyer

689 F. App'x 751

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 25, 2017

DocketNo. 16-7363

StatusPublished

This text of 689 F. App'x 751 (Tarpley v. Moyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tarpley v. Moyer, 689 F. App'x 751 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Steven E. Tarpley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tarpley v. Moyer, No. 1:15-cv-01132-GLR, 2016 WL 5144487 (D. Md. Sept. 21, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Steven E. Tarpley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tarpley v. Moyer, No. 1:15-cv-01132-GLR, 2016 WL 5144487 (D. Md. Sept. 21, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

689 F. App'x 751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tarpley-v-moyer-ca4-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack