Tarpenning v. Compton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Tarpenning v. Compton

1915 OK 606, 151 P. 681, 51 Okla. 41, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 928

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 7, 1915

Docket4881

StatusPublished

This text of 1915 OK 606 (Tarpenning v. Compton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tarpenning v. Compton, 1915 OK 606, 151 P. 681, 51 Okla. 41, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 928 (Okla. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

*42 Opinion By

CROW, C.

The record in this cause fails to show that the case-made was filed in the trial court. For this reason the appeal must be dismissed. Plaintiffs in error fail to assign as error the overruling of their motion for new trial in the court below, and, it being necessary to review the evidence in order to consider the appeal, this of itself would justify a dismissal. However, the first reason given herein necessitates a dismissal of the appeal.

We recommend that the appeal be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*42 Opinion By

CROW, C.

The record in this cause fails to show that the case-made was filed in the trial court. For this reason the appeal must be dismissed. Plaintiffs in error fail to assign as error the overruling of their motion for new trial in the court below, and, it being necessary to review the evidence in order to consider the appeal, this of itself would justify a dismissal. However, the first reason given herein necessitates a dismissal of the appeal.

We recommend that the appeal be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1915 OK 606, 151 P. 681, 51 Okla. 41, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tarpenning-v-compton-okla-1915.