Tarontae Jackson v. Officer Aki

Opinion

Tarontae Jackson, Case No. 2:24-cv-01950-GMN-NJK

Plaintiff(s), ORDER v. [Docket No. 20]

Officer Aki, Defendant(s). Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion requesting an additional service attempt on Defendant. Docket No. 20.1 Plaintiff explains that he seeks to serve Defendant at the address for Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. See Docket No. 20 at 1. The motion requesting an additional service attempt on Defendant is GRANTED. The Court further ORDERS as follows: 1. The Clerk of Court shall send a copy of the summons (Docket No. 12) and complaint (Docket No. 7) to the U.S. Marshal for service. 2. The Clerk of Court shall send Plaintiff a copy of the required Form USM-285. 3. Plaintiff shall have twenty days in which to furnish the U.S. Marshal with the required Form USM-285. Within twenty days after receiving from the U.S. Marshal a copy of the Form USM-285, showing whether service has been accomplished, Plaintiff must file a notice with the court identifying whether defendant was served. If Plaintiff wishes to have service again attempted on an unserved defendant, a motion must be filed with the Court identifying the unserved defendant and specifying a more detailed name and/or address for said defendant, or whether some other manner of service should be attempted. 1 The Court liberally construes the filings of pro se litigants, particularly those who are prisoners bringing civil rights claims. Blaisdell v. Frappiea, 729 F.3d 1237, 1241 (9th Cir. 2013). 1 4. The deadline to effectuate service is EXTENDED to January 30, 2026. Dated: December 2, 2025 Nancy J. oppe _ United tate {agistrate Judge