Tarone v. Tarone
This text of 25 A.D.3d 781 (Tarone v. Tarone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover on a mortgage note, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pines, J.), dated September 20, 2004, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Madeleine Tarone which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Madeleine Tarone established her entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Goldstein, J.P., Mastro, Spolzino and Lunn, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 A.D.3d 781, 807 N.Y.S.2d 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tarone-v-tarone-nyappdiv-2006.