Taron Jacquett v. Estefania Jacquett

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 24, 2025
Docket6D2024-2519
StatusPublished

This text of Taron Jacquett v. Estefania Jacquett (Taron Jacquett v. Estefania Jacquett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taron Jacquett v. Estefania Jacquett, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

Case No. 6D2024-2519 Lower Tribunal No. 2021-DR-003477 _____________________________

TARON JACQUETT,

Appellant, v.

ESTEFANIA JACQUETT,

Appellee. _____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County. Christy C. Collins, Judge.

October 24, 2025

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150,

1152 (Fla. 1979) (“In appellate proceedings the decision of a trial court has the

presumption of correctness and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error.

. . . The trial court should have been affirmed because the record brought forward by

the appellant is inadequate to demonstrate reversible error.”); Robinson v. Robinson,

50 Fla. L. Weekly D1997, D1997 (Fla. 6th DCA Sept. 5, 2025) (stating that where

error appears for first time on final judgment’s face, party must alert trial court to error through motion for rehearing or some other appropriate motion to preserve it

for appeal); Julia v. Ramos-Baez, 395 So. 3d 1121, 1123 (Fla. 6th DCA 2024)

(“Without the transcript of the relevant proceeding, an appellate court cannot

conduct ‘an examination of the entire case’ to determine whether the trial court

actually failed to make the required findings.” (quoting § 59.041, Fla. Stat.)).

TRAVER, C.J., and MIZE and BROWNLEE, JJ., concur.

Taron Jacquett, Saint Cloud, pro se.

Ronda Denise Westfall, of The Westfall Law Firm, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Taron Jacquett v. Estefania Jacquett, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taron-jacquett-v-estefania-jacquett-fladistctapp-2025.